Is this Google CENSORSHIP, & to protect a CRIMINAL?

Well, I am not happy with the treatment that has been dealt to me over my life time. Thankfully, I am very smart. I think most people who have been mis-treated as I end up in prison. The parasites in the police force, are so readily caught by this 'flytrap'. Those gutless parasite police like Image
Henri Elias Rantala target such people.

Other gutless parasite pigs targeted me in the 1980's in Townsville when I was the Accountant Tax-Agent principal of of Image in Townsvillle. They tried targeting me. Of course, they were alerted to me by the corrupt 'solicitor' [soon to be struck off for good] mate of the corrupt police, Terence Joseph Mellifont. He perjured himself to the Fitzgerald Inquiry to protect his corrupt police 'mates'; see Mellifont v Attorney-General (Qld) [1991] HCA 53; (1991) 173 CLR 289 (12 December 1991) HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.

Wouldn't it have been useful to me if I could have been warned of the likes of Mellifont and Spender? What could be a presage to that criminal conduct"? What 'taught' them to be that way? Maybe it was their PARENTS. Similarily, the offstpring of criminals [especially those who have escaped being brought to account - like Mellifont [See also Terence Joseph Mellifont. In the last paragraph on page 3 of this article, where I use the pseudonym of 'Haig' to refer to myself, I set out how Mellifont defrauded me in 1974.] and Jeffrey Ernest John Spender] are likely to be influenced into following a criminal life, especially when the criminal parents have escaped being brought to account - like Mellifont and Spender. Associates and spouses of such are likely to be 'tarred with the same brush'. Isn't if fortunate that Mellifont had a few kids? Hey Terry and Jeff, you were real smart back in 1974 to defraud and cheat me like that, weren't you? You didn't know about the Internet then, did you? It will improve, too. It is growing exponentially. [You would know what 'exponentially' means hey Jeff?] What's there, stays there [so many copies are kept around the world]. The Internet is the NEW FRONTIER.

Is this Google CENSORSHIP, & to protect a CRIMINAL?

Postby russellm » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:46 am

Is this Google CENSORSHIP, & to protect a CRIMINAL?

Is this Google CENSORSHIP, & to protect a CRIMINAL?

Image

CLICK HERE or on any of the images to read the FULL STORY of how
Google CENSORSHIP is protecting a CRIMINAL. We do not know if that was the intention but it is the effect.

Image

Is this the beginning of the end for Google? Maybe if you have shares in Google, now may be a good time to sell. If you do not have Google stock, and wish to make a profit in these difficult times, now may be the time to SHORT-SELL Google shares.

Ask.com did not censor the Search results. Maybe Ask.com should be your preferred search engine from now. This censorship was Google's choice.

regards,

Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
User avatar
russellm
Site Admin
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:26 am

Return to CHILDREN, SPOUSES and ASSOCIATES of Globally PROVEN Shonks & Shysters

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron